Search found 18 matches
- 27 Aug 2020, 22:58
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Common Soul Gems?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4744
Re: Common Soul Gems?
Awesome ty
- 27 Aug 2020, 15:43
- Forum: Off Topic
- Topic: Common Soul Gems?
- Replies: 2
- Views: 4744
Common Soul Gems?
Most help topics I can find are concerned with restocking grand soul gems. I'd like to know which sellers have restocking common soul gems? There are probably dozens but I can't find them among the hundreds of merchant NPCs.
- 24 Jul 2020, 22:18
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Trying to build for the first time in a while, getting a cmake error (Debian)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1743
Re: Trying to build for the first time in a while, getting a cmake error (Debian)
Cool. At least I know now. I built it in a folder other than /bin or /usr/bin. How do I point cmake to the right folder?
Edit: nvm I figured it out. Thanks for your help. For anyone else who has qt in a non standard folder you need to add -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH="/path/to/qt/".
Edit: nvm I figured it out. Thanks for your help. For anyone else who has qt in a non standard folder you need to add -DCMAKE_PREFIX_PATH="/path/to/qt/".
- 24 Jul 2020, 15:23
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Trying to build for the first time in a while, getting a cmake error (Debian)
- Replies: 2
- Views: 1743
[Solved] Trying to build for the first time in a while, getting a cmake error (Debian)
When I try to run cmake I get: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:151 (find_package): Could not find a configuration file for package "Qt5Core" that is compatible with requested version "5.12". The following configuration files were considered but not accepted: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-g...
- 02 May 2020, 01:41
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2462
Re: Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
If I switch off the shadows on the source build I get the same performance as the generic build. I really think that's why the generic build's performance was so much better than the source build at first. Marking this solved. Thanks, guys.
- 30 Apr 2020, 21:42
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2462
Re: Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
It builds fine like that. But I'm still getting worse performance than the generic build. Am I correct in saying that the generic build has no shadows? That would explain the difference in performance. Disabling shadows on the 0.47 build gives me similar performance.
- 30 Apr 2020, 14:47
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2462
Re: Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
It's possible the GLVND issue is because you're using an OSG package not linked with it. Could you elaborate? Do you mean that I'm building openmw with an OSG package or that I'm using an OSG package as part of my system in general? If it's the former how do I link it with GLVND? Sorry I'm still a ...
- 30 Apr 2020, 03:32
- Forum: Support
- Topic: [Solved] Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2462
[Solved] Better Performance on Pre-built release than self-built, GLVND Problem (Debian)
When I download the binary from the Release section on GitHub I can get 60fps just about anywhere (With the odd spike). However when I build it myself, I can't get 60fps in Balmora/Vivec. I have tried building like: cmake .. -DDESIRED_QT_VERSION=5 -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release But it doesn't make any d...
Re: WINE help
Update: As a last resort, I tried the lib1-glx with apt-get instead of aptitude. It worked, but now I'm worried that the 64bit libraries have been replaced with 32bit versions. Is there a log file that shows what was added/removed during an apt-get installation?
Re: WINE help
Yes, dpkg --print-foreign-architectures show i386. There seems to be four packages that are causing problems for nvidia-driver-libs:i386 The following packages have unmet dependencies: libegl1 : Breaks: libegl1:i386 (!= 1.1.0-1+b1) but 1.1.0-1 is to be installed libegl1:i386 : Depends: libglvnd0:i38...