OpenMW 0.14.0

Anything related to PR, release planning and any other non-technical idea how to move the project forward should be discussed here.
K1ll
Posts: 184
Joined: 06 Aug 2011, 21:54

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by K1ll »

raevol wrote:Since we are putting the .debs on the PPA, all I seem to be missing is a source package. Or should I get that from github somehow?
Just use the openmw-0.14.0 tag for the source package. You can get it here:
https://github.com/zinnschlag/openmw/tags

Also i've uploaded my Linux binary packages here:

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/65141287/openmw ... nux.tar.gz

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/65141287/openmw ... Bit.tar.gz
User avatar
scrawl
Posts: 2152
Joined: 18 Feb 2012, 11:51

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by scrawl »

I tested the 64 bit binary, it's missing libOgreTerrain.so.1.8.0
K1ll
Posts: 184
Joined: 06 Aug 2011, 21:54

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by K1ll »

scrawl wrote:I tested the 64 bit binary, it's missing libOgreTerrain.so.1.8.0
Thanks for noticing. I've updated the packages.
User avatar
pvdk
Posts: 528
Joined: 12 Aug 2011, 16:34

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by pvdk »

And here's a source package in .tar.bz2 format, just like the previous ones.
User avatar
Ace (SWE)
Posts: 887
Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 14:56

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by Ace (SWE) »

Uploaded new packages, just to be on the safe side:
Windows 32-bit
Windows 64-bit
User avatar
raevol
Posts: 3093
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 01:12
Location: Caldera

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by raevol »

Sweet, thanks for all the packages guys. I'm missing an .rpm, but I don't think I'm going to let that delay the release. But I am going to have to actually "do" the release tomorrow. :( Stay tuned.
User avatar
sirherrbatka
Posts: 2159
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 17:21

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by sirherrbatka »

Code: Select all

error while loading shared libraries: libOgrePaging.so.1.8.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
on x86_64
User avatar
artorius
Posts: 46
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 13:59
Location: VA, USA

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by artorius »

raevol wrote:Sweet, thanks for all the packages guys. I'm missing an .rpm, but I don't think I'm going to let that delay the release. But I am going to have to actually "do" the release tomorrow. :( Stay tuned.
I'll have the new builds up in the Fedora yum repository tomorrow. You could just list in the release that users of Fedora can just do a "yum update openmw" to get the new version. I'll update the Fedora post after I get this done.

Actually, raevol if you want just use the same fedora 16 repo rpm that I gave you for 0.13.0, this same file can be used to get the new 0.14.0 Fedora builds.

UPDATE: x86_64 Fedora 16 builds are now in the OpenMW Fedora repo. i686 builds will be up tomorrow.
K1ll
Posts: 184
Joined: 06 Aug 2011, 21:54

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by K1ll »

sirherrbatka wrote:

Code: Select all

error while loading shared libraries: libOgrePaging.so.1.8.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
on x86_64
Thanks to you too. Rechecked dependencies with ldd and uploaded new builds. Everything should be fine now.
User avatar
lgromanowski
Site Admin
Posts: 1193
Joined: 05 Aug 2011, 22:21
Location: Wroclaw, Poland
Contact:

Re: OpenMW 0.14.0

Post by lgromanowski »

artorius wrote:
raevol wrote:Sweet, thanks for all the packages guys. I'm missing an .rpm, but I don't think I'm going to let that delay the release. But I am going to have to actually "do" the release tomorrow. :( Stay tuned.
I'll have the new builds up in the Fedora yum repository tomorrow. You could just list in the release that users of Fedora can just do a "yum update openmw" to get the new version. I'll update the Fedora post after I get this done.

Actually, raevol if you want just use the same fedora 16 repo rpm that I gave you for 0.13.0, this same file can be used to get the new 0.14.0 Fedora builds.

UPDATE: x86_64 Fedora 16 builds are now in the OpenMW Fedora repo. i686 builds will be up tomorrow.
Please send me a PM when they will be available, so I could put them at openmw.org/builds/fedora directory.
Post Reply