QT C++ what?

Join the team. This area is for people who want to participate in OpenMW's development in one way or another.
Post Reply
surgemcgee
Posts: 2
Joined: 09 Feb 2014, 20:51

QT C++ what?

Post by surgemcgee »

You found him. I have a vast understanding of QT and the widgets. If someone wants top skype or something and brief me on the setup, I would be happy to give some work a try.

By the way: it is "QT", not "cute" like the losers pronounce it ;)
User avatar
psi29a
Posts: 5361
Joined: 29 Sep 2011, 10:13
Location: Belgium
Gitlab profile: https://gitlab.com/psi29a/
Contact:

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by psi29a »

surgemcgee wrote:You found him. I have a vast understanding of QT and the widgets. If someone wants top skype or something and brief me on the setup, I would be happy to give some work a try.

By the way: it is "QT", not "cute" like the losers pronounce it ;)
So... Qt is "cutie". :P

You should fix it here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qt_(software)
Qt (/ˈkjuːt/ "cute", or unofficially as Q-T cue-tee[6][7])
^-- personally, I do not care... so long as it gets the job done.

It is better to hang out on IRC, since that is where everyone (except Zini) is at:
#openmw @ irc.freenode.org

Does your vast understanding of Qt also include tying it in with Ogre3D? 8-)
User avatar
WeirdSexy
Posts: 611
Joined: 15 Sep 2011, 18:50
Location: USA

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by WeirdSexy »

I am a loser.
maqifrnswa
Posts: 180
Joined: 14 Jan 2013, 03:57

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by maqifrnswa »

WeirdSexy wrote:I am a loser.
http://youtu.be/YgSPaXgAdzE
User avatar
pvdk
Posts: 528
Joined: 12 Aug 2011, 16:34

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by pvdk »

Pronounce it however you want, but please don't write it like "QT," because that's short for QuickTime.
SquireNed
Posts: 403
Joined: 21 Dec 2013, 22:18

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by SquireNed »

Or we could just ignore Apple's sub-par video player entry.
User avatar
raevol
Posts: 3093
Joined: 07 Aug 2011, 01:12
Location: Caldera

Re: QT C++ what?

Post by raevol »

SquireNed wrote:Or we could just ignore Apple's sub-par video player entry.
:idea: :idea: :idea:
Post Reply