GMST Verifier
Re: GMST Verifier
If we ever add custom GMSTs the verifier should ignore these, because it has no way of knowing what is right and what not. The dehardcoding should not affect the GMST verifier much. You don't need to consider it.
Re: GMST Verifier
Just realized there was a second page 
My worry is that people would use the same name for a variable but change its type if it ever goes through, but I'll just ignore the dehardcoding at this point.
I'll be posting numeric limitations for the gmst by Sunday based on my version of common sense or what I know breaks the original mw.
I made a google docs file. If anyone want to edit or comment on it, feel free. I'll slowly be filling it out.
Also, in apps/opencs/model/doc/document.cpp there are lists of GMST data. Should I put this data in a header?
My worry is that people would use the same name for a variable but change its type if it ever goes through, but I'll just ignore the dehardcoding at this point.
I'll be posting numeric limitations for the gmst by Sunday based on my version of common sense or what I know breaks the original mw.
I made a google docs file. If anyone want to edit or comment on it, feel free. I'll slowly be filling it out.
Also, in apps/opencs/model/doc/document.cpp there are lists of GMST data. Should I put this data in a header?