OpenMW 0.42.0

Anything related to PR, release planning and any other non-technical idea how to move the project forward should be discussed here.
Post Reply
TechNoirMK
Posts: 84
Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 15:58

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by TechNoirMK »

Is it me, or hitting enemies lower than you has gotten wonky lately?
User avatar
Greendogo
Posts: 1467
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 02:04

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by Greendogo »

Got bored, made a chart.
Image
User avatar
psi29a
Posts: 5355
Joined: 29 Sep 2011, 10:13
Location: Belgium
Gitlab profile: https://gitlab.com/psi29a/
Contact:

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by psi29a »

But 4/3/2017 is already passed... ;)
User avatar
Greendogo
Posts: 1467
Joined: 26 Aug 2011, 02:04

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by Greendogo »

psi29a wrote:But 4/3/2017 is already passed... ;)
Apologies, that's Month/Day/Year, not Day/Month/Year :?
robcbwilson
Posts: 39
Joined: 04 Dec 2014, 14:15

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by robcbwilson »

It is impressive that the releases are on such a regular release schedule! Nice chart too :D

0.42 will be a great release...
User avatar
Zobator
Posts: 62
Joined: 23 Nov 2014, 19:35

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by Zobator »

Greendogo wrote: Apologies, that's Month/Day/Year, not Day/Month/Year :?
You heretic...
User avatar
Ace (SWE)
Posts: 887
Joined: 15 Aug 2011, 14:56

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by Ace (SWE) »

Image

XKCD is always relevant.
maqifrnswa
Posts: 180
Joined: 14 Jan 2013, 03:57

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by maqifrnswa »

Greendogo wrote:Got bored, made a chart.
that is incredible, open source project don't usually don't release that frequently nor consistently!
TechNoirMK
Posts: 84
Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 15:58

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by TechNoirMK »

>53%
>April
Yeah, right. I'd estimate the release at least in May, unless at some point the remaining issues go to 0.43.
User avatar
Capostrophic
Posts: 794
Joined: 22 Feb 2016, 20:32

Re: OpenMW 0.42.0

Post by Capostrophic »

TechNoirMK wrote:unless at some point the remaining issues go to 0.43.
Uh, of course they would. It always was that way.
Post Reply