Benchmarks / Hardware Specs

A generic talk on the OpenMW project.
User avatar
Zobator
Posts: 54
Joined: 23 Nov 2014, 19:35

Re: Benchmarks

Post by Zobator » 20 Oct 2016, 16:50

lysol wrote:It uses a Streacom FC9 case (the one without an optical slot), which means that it is totally passively cooled.
Streamcom cases are so epic! :D I'd love to have their DB4 for a multimedia setup!

Quite impressive benchmarks indeed for a passively cooled system :)

User avatar
lysol
Posts: 636
Joined: 26 Mar 2013, 01:48
Location: Sweden

Re: Benchmarks

Post by lysol » 20 Oct 2016, 17:24

Zobator wrote:
lysol wrote:It uses a Streacom FC9 case (the one without an optical slot), which means that it is totally passively cooled.
Streamcom cases are so epic! :D I'd love to have their DB4 for a multimedia setup!

Quite impressive benchmarks indeed for a passively cooled system :)
Yes, I'm as happy as I could be really. It's really quick and makes literally no noise at all. I can't even hear any electronic noises. The look of it is totally gorgeous. It comes with a cost though, their cases have a quite high price tag. But for a case in thick aluminium with this look, I think it's worth it. At least if you are after silence.. with a bit of style... 8-)

It would probably work as a gaming setup though. I've read about some one who mounted a mid-range graphics card (think it was a geforce GT650 or 660 or something) and managed to get the graphics card to be cooled on the other half of the case. It worked apparently, but I think you should be careful doing that unless you have money to spare on replacing burnt graphics cards. And having a GT650 isn't that much of a über setup anyway.
Normal mapped texture replacers, exclusive for OpenMW:
My Nexus page

Flatlander
Posts: 2
Joined: 10 Feb 2017, 05:41

Re: Benchmarks

Post by Flatlander » 10 Feb 2017, 05:46

I had to get an account to post this.

I have downgraded my pc a bit for different life situation. So I have a surface pro 2 for my computer. I have been getting a hankering for some morrowind and I happened to discover this site. I just tested 0.41 and I was holding 60 fps inside and out. Now I have not gone trough and readded my mods, but the initial results look great, even on a simple system.

TechNoirMK
Posts: 67
Joined: 19 Aug 2015, 15:58

Re: Benchmarks

Post by TechNoirMK » 26 Feb 2017, 03:44

Can anyone with potatoes and toasters test the latest nightly?

User avatar
Capostrophic
Posts: 234
Joined: 22 Feb 2016, 20:32

Re: Benchmarks

Post by Capostrophic » 26 Feb 2017, 06:46

45-55 FPS in Balmora @ the settings from the start post.

Intel Core i5 3210M, Nvidia GeForce 610M, 8GB of RAM.
shitty lingua anglica grammar ftw

Xenuria
Posts: 16
Joined: 26 Feb 2017, 22:35

Re: Benchmarks / Hardware Specs

Post by Xenuria » 03 Aug 2017, 22:18

Hardware
CPU: Intel Core i7-2600K
GPU: Nvidia GTX 1080
SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 512GB
SSD: Samsung 840 Pro 256GB
RAM: Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 1866 CL10 Series 16GB
MBD: MSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)

http://www.userbenchmark.com/UserRun/4526002


OpenMW
2560 x 1600 (16 : 10) Windowed
Settings.cfg
http://i.imgur.com/YUcM0pf.png Console Errors
http://i.imgur.com/gns90I6.jpg <-- Indoors
http://i.imgur.com/hanapos.jpg <-- outdoors

So FPS takes a nose dive when you are outdoors and if you want distant land and set view distance accordingly while keeping grids to 1, you get maybe 12-25 fps. Not sure what the issue is but hopefully this information is useful.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests