openmw.org

Ok cool, that seems to have worked out. Thanks for coming in WeirdSexy! As psi29a said they're just finishing up but have some cleanup before we're actually at the end of 0.46.0. Can anyone give a brief comb-through of the 0.46.0.changes for the highlights we'd want covered in WeirdSexy's release vi...

Maybe we can get a classic video dude like WeirdSexy to do it? Has anyone seen him around the ES community? Edit: Sent him a message. Did you get a reply? Yes I did, here is the exchange: Hey WeirdSexy, just wanted to ask if you'd have time to do a super special one-time exclusive comeback tour rel...

CircleCI has a beta 10.15
https://circleci.com/docs/2.0/testing-ios/

Good luck on finishing your Masters!!!

Maybe we can get a classic video dude like WeirdSexy to do it? Has anyone seen him around the ES community? Edit: Sent him a message.

MacOS 10.15 was just released about a week ago and Travis already has up to Xcode 11.2 support (which has std::filesystem support). It's just a matter of time now. Sadly not... I bet you that it is indeed a matter of time. Some number of picoseconds greater than 0 from now until the end of the univ...

An update is being worked on by lysol ;) Also, as a side note, according to the repo page OpenMW 0.46.0 currently stands at 90% done. Looking through the 23 issues that remain unresolved, a good majority of them seem to be nearing completion or at least have a good amount of work done on them. There...

Husaco wrote: ↑13 Sep 2019, 08:34 Starwarsguy was an old hand from the modding community

I remember when Starwarsguy/gal was a greenhorn trying to get ahead in the wild world of modding. My how time doth fly.

The main problem is still MacOS. std::filesystem/std::experimental::filesystem isn't there yet until MacOS 10.15 and Travis doesn't have that yet. Having the SDK installed is not enough, the libstdc++ of the system itself has to be updated and Travis still uses 10.14. MacOS 10.15 was just released ...

AnyOldName3 wrote: ↑14 Oct 2019, 22:51 ... but there are reasons not to, too.

What are all of the reasons?

Hey, just wondering if there's any support for changing to stl::filesystem from Boost::filesystem now that it's supported in most compilers.

There are around 100 references to the Boost::filesystem library in the code right now which make up the VAST majority of Boost usage in the code base.