openmw.org

Can confirm.

Capostrophic wrote: ↑17 Oct 2018, 13:57 I volunteer to write a changelog, but I still think we must not hurry with the RC phase start.
The hopes for that issue is on Thunderforge, but he seems to be busy.

I could try and check which nightly that regression popped up.

I too agree with this being implemented, makes the inventory MUCH easier to use.

Also, the pipeline only decides to start building and saving artifacts for commits coming from Gitlab, and not Github, even though a few months ago it was building artifacts from commits that originated from GitHub.

Weirdly enough it stopped producing build artifacts. Edit: It seems to have some build artifacts from recent PRs/MRs, but strangely enough the gitlab pipeline has been running 2 jobs for over 3 months. Edit 2: So it seems those 2 jobs are stuck on AppVeyor building, even though appveyor already buil...

psi29a wrote: ↑16 Oct 2018, 22:56 I'd much rather try to get things building and hosting on AppVeyor. Trigger coming either from GL or from GH on merge into master. Either way, I think AV is the way to go.

Speaking of GL, didn't it have automated builds for Linux @ https://gitlab.com/OpenMW/openmw/pipelines?

AnyOldName3 wrote: ↑16 Oct 2018, 21:35 I'm pretty sure Travis does artefacts if you tell it to. I think that's how Dolphin Emulator does its Ubuntu and OSX builds.

https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/uploading-artifacts/

wareya wrote: ↑10 Oct 2018, 02:01 It's "no major glitches", not "no glitches".

What counts as a major glitch?

wareya wrote: ↑09 Oct 2018, 00:06 The GoTY version can be used for the "no major glitches" categories.

Isn't "no glitches" pretty shallow in meaning?