Search found 39 matches

by mikeprichard
10 Mar 2019, 12:03
Forum: Organisation and Planning
Topic: OpenMW 0.45.0
Replies: 379
Views: 82405

Re: OpenMW 0.45.0

@mikeprichard because we are still in the RC phase and catching things because we don't have enough testers. So if you would like to see new releases faster, then we need more testers to test our builds before we release. So it is actually a good thing that we are holding off until the videos are r...
by mikeprichard
10 Mar 2019, 06:23
Forum: Organisation and Planning
Topic: OpenMW 0.45.0
Replies: 379
Views: 82405

Re: OpenMW 0.45.0

Imo it's actually better to stagger the main release and the video release. Have the main one out so there's one spike in interest, then a recap video on the update to rekindle interest for anyone who missed the main release. Sorry if I'm interrupting, but as a non-developer who's been watching Ope...
by mikeprichard
20 Feb 2019, 11:23
Forum: Organisation and Planning
Topic: OpenMW 0.45.0
Replies: 379
Views: 82405

Re: OpenMW 0.45.0

Same here, but I thought it was an intended feature or something and that's why I never reported it. To be honest 0.44 has been in general a problematic upgrade for me , to the point I reverted back to 0.43 some time ago. Did you report these bugs to the GitLab bugtracker (assuming they're not dupl...
by mikeprichard
20 Dec 2018, 13:16
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

Re: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

Thank you, psi29a, and I can see on git how much work you also put into the project every day to get OpenMW to 1.0. Much appreciated. My original questions have been answered here, so I'll just let you all get back to work!
by mikeprichard
19 Dec 2018, 20:04
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

Re: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

It seems that this forum is becoming the place for everyone who doesn't contribute to give their opinion about what should or shouldn't OpenMW do; without even bothering reading the previous debates. Maybe we should put some items in the FAQ about MGE/MCP/MWSE/… :/ As I already stated, that was not...
by mikeprichard
17 Dec 2018, 23:16
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

Re: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

Capostrophic, I've often scanned the bug tracker/git over the past few years, and (no offense intended to the many other active contributors working on OpenMW in their limited free time), it's clear that both you and Andrei Kortunov have been critical to the rapid progress OpenMW's seen for some tim...
by mikeprichard
17 Dec 2018, 02:38
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

Re: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

The way the change is being described sounds like a reasonable compromise to me as well. It should still be fairly easy to increase speechcraft with repeated key presses for those (like me) who have no shame in doing that, but at least you won't be able to just weigh down the key and auto-level.
by mikeprichard
16 Dec 2018, 21:09
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

Re: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

Thanks lysol; I realized after posting that I probably misunderstood the change, and will need to test it in-game with 0.45.

Otherwise, is the wiki article accurate as to current status, and are all of the MCP features not already simulated in OpenMW planned for inclusion in OpenMW after 1.0?
by mikeprichard
16 Dec 2018, 20:00
Forum: General Development
Topic: OpenMW future plans and MCP features?
Replies: 15
Views: 3164

OpenMW future plans and MCP features?

Long-time OpenMW forum lurker, first-time poster here. Short version: is the wiki here (https://wiki.openmw.org/index.php?title=MCP) accurate as to the current status of OpenMW re: the incorporation of bugfixes and features from MCP? Longer version/disclaimers: I've been scanning the forums at least...