Search found 5190 matches
Just an idea: Since there are so many opinions and varying perceptions about this, how about we do a test run once 0.44.0 is released? We can then evaluate the results at the 0.45.0 release and decide if we want to keep the new scheme or return to the old one.
- 22 May 2018, 10:48
- Forum: New Developers Applications
- Topic: Application: Declan (with new feature fork)
- Replies: 4
- Views: 176
Welcome! Find our comments on the PR. Looks like we are going to merge it (with a minor modification). Can you please add an issue to the tracker for this change and assign it to yourself, so we have a record of the change in our changelog?
> How would he be most affected? (I get the idea that you think this will a lot more work for devs when it really isn't.) Well, I assume he will at some point pick up merging PRs to a significant degree. And this is more work for the person who is doing the merging/reviewing. He has to check if the ...
You would basically like to have the same procedure as we have it now, but get notified whenever a new issue is solved (that requires an entry to the changelog), so you can keep writing the more verbose release version of the changelog item per item during development instead of all at once at relea...
@raevol: Wasn't aware that this is so much additional work for you. Problem is, if we let individual developers write their changelog entries these entries are probably not in a presentable state suitable for the end user. Coder's mindset vs end user's mindset and all. These entries would be end-use...
Not sure what all the recent discussions about getting developer status on the tracker are all about. Normally I set the developer status when I merge the first pull request (because that is the time when you become an OpenMW developer). But that only works if you have an account on the tracker at t...
- 17 May 2018, 14:03
- Forum: Organisation and Planning
- Topic: Post 1.0 Planning Update
- Replies: 94
- Views: 7251
First revision complete. Got a bit delayed by RL crap. I want to do another pass and then we can go ahead. A bit behind the original plan, but not too bad. I hope to have the document ready once scrawl comes out of his cave again.
Sorry, I fail to see what the point of this change is. Our current procedure seems to work fine IMO. decrease the time preparing release because the changelog is more or less ready Not really an issue. Now my time is very limited these days, but updating the change log once every could of month I st...