openmw.org

What's your rendering resolution? Your GPU is very low end, so if you're fill rate bound, lower the resolution.

It's a joke within a joke. "Within C is a smaller, simpler, safer language struggling to get out." is also true! I wouldn't really call C "safe", C code safety is a measure of how competent the programmer is. Which is the most important metric by far, as opposed to how the safegu...

EmperorArthur wrote:I really like his "Within C++ is a smaller, simpler, safer language struggling to get out."

You mean C?

^ looks like environment mapping is enabled without being modulated appropriately in the material shader.

i'm happy for you. for those who didn't already know, they do now.

Another AMD+AMD here. I get really bad performance with the reflective water (even if the shader file itself is nearly emptied) but with texture water fog is applied wrong. Getting a pixel-shaded water setting that doesn't set up reflections would be great, at least until the vertex-shaded water is...

But I don't have any plans for this specific part of the code base. It expresses clearly what is going on and in general you should not be bothered by verbosity when using C++ (at least if this verbosity conveys useful information). Thanks for responding Zini. I say this all respectfully; just voic...

I honestly cannot tell if you're joking.

Was never really a question of understandability, although it isn't clear why the API was designed to be that way. That's only 1 metric, out of a large pool, to care about.

Too long to even all fit into the subject line field. static const int iMonthsToRespawn = MWBase::Environment::get().getWorld()->getStore().get<ESM::GameSetting>().find("iMonthsToRespawn")->getInt(); API running away with itself it seems. Is this kind of insanity part of the cost the proje...

Would you defend why long, unwieldy lines of code are objectively better than short, wieldy ones? I didn't say that. What I meant is that we shouldn't be bothered by these, if they contain useful, explicit information. Thanks for the response, Zini. Your added clause is helpful, although the point ...